Findings and sanctions of past hearings
Details of published findings and sanctions imposed by Disciplinary Tribunals since BTAS started operations on 1 February 2013 are provided here. Please note that, in line with the BTAS Publication Policy, findings will be removed from the website after 2 years, unless the finding of the Disciplinary Tribunal involves a suspension or disbarment. In these cases, the finding will be posted on the BTAS website indefinitely.
Details of findings and sanctions are published in accordance with the BTAS Publication Policy: Disciplinary Tribunals and other adjudication hearings.
In exceptional circumstances, a tribunal can require the Bar Standards Board to suspend the defendant’s practising certificate from a date determined by the tribunal and which can take immediate effect (rE227 and rE228 of the Bar Standards Board Handbook). In all other instances, the sanction described in the finding sheets attached will only come into effect after the time for appeal has expired. The date is further determined either by a decision of the Treasurer of the defendant’s Inn or the disposal of the appeal should one be made. For specific detail, please refer to the Enforcement Regulations at rE239 and rE241.
Appeals against relevant decisions of Bar Disciplinary Tribunals made before 7 January 2014 were heard by the Visitors to the Inns of Court. Since that date appeals fall under the jurisdiction of the High Court (rE236). The outcome of Visitors’ Hearings (appeals) and appeals to the High Court are also listed on this section of the website.
Using the facility below you may search by: name of barrister; date; type of hearing; sentence and section of the code.
Each set of findings is accorded a status on the following basis:
Open to Appeal: The case is within the period that a barrister can appeal the finding but no appeal has been submitted.
Appeal Pending – Sanction Stayed / Appeal Pending: The barrister has submitted an appeal, which is yet to be heard and the sanction will not be implemented until after the outcome of the appeal is known. This will be the case unless the Disciplinary Tribunal has ordered that the sanction should take effect immediately.
Final – The finding has been pronounced either after the appeal period has expired or following the result of an appeal.
New findings are posted within seven days of a decision, although it can take up to 24 hours for the finding to appear on the website following its posting (or for a finding to not show on the website following its removal).
Details of all publishable findings and sanctionss imposed by Disciplinary Tribunals from 2002 to the present date can also be found on the Bar Standards Board website by clicking here.
An alternative means of dealing with professional misconduct complaints is provided by the Determination by Consent (‘DBC’) procedure. This process is where the Professional Conduct Committee exercises its power to determine the outcome of a disciplinary case with the barrister’s consent. It is designed to provide a more speedy resolution of straightforward cases without the need for a formal Disciplinary Tribunal hearing. Further information on the procedure can be accessed here.
Details of the practising status of any barrister can be found on the Bar Standards Board website, click here for further information.
-
Mon 30 Dec
-
Tue 31 Dec
-
Wed 01 Jan
-
Thu 02 Jan
-
Fri 03 Jan
-
Sat 04 Jan
-
Sun 05 Jan
-
Mon 06 Jan
-
Tue 07 Jan
-
Wed 08 Jan
-
Thu 09 Jan
- Defendant
-
John McLanachan
(Gray's Inn)
- Type of hearing
- 5 Person Tribunal
- Panel members
-
- Her Honour Janet Waddicor (Chair)
- Mr Scott McDonnell
- Mrs Aaminah Khan
- Ms Claire Cheetham
- Ms Stephanie McIntosh
- Finding and sentence
-
On 9 January 2025 the Tribunal disbarred Mr McLanachan and requested the BSB not to issue a practising certificate pending any appeal.
Costs - £3,510 to the BSB - Status
- Open to appeal
- Dates
- Thursday 9 - Friday 10 January 2025
-
Fri 10 Jan
- Defendant
-
John McLanachan
(Gray's Inn)
- Type of hearing
- 5 Person Tribunal
- Panel members
-
- Her Honour Janet Waddicor (Chair)
- Mr Scott McDonnell
- Mrs Aaminah Khan
- Ms Claire Cheetham
- Ms Stephanie McIntosh
- Finding and sentence
-
On 9 January 2025 the Tribunal disbarred Mr McLanachan and requested the BSB not to issue a practising certificate pending any appeal.
Costs - £3,510 to the BSB - Status
- Open to appeal
- Dates
- Thursday 9 - Friday 10 January 2025
-
Sat 11 Jan
-
Sun 12 Jan
-
Mon 13 Jan
-
Tue 14 Jan
-
Wed 15 Jan
-
Thu 16 Jan
-
Fri 17 Jan
-
Sat 18 Jan
-
Sun 19 Jan
-
Mon 20 Jan
- Defendant
-
Alan Wheetman
(Middle Temple)
- Type of hearing
- 5 Person Disciplinary Tribunal
- Panel members
-
- His Honour James Meston KC (Chair)
- Ms Monica Stevenson
- Mr Alexander Horne
- Mr Ian Arundale
- Mr Vince Cullen
- Finding and sentence
-
On 10 February 2025 the Tribunal requested the BSB not to issue Mr Wheetman with a practising certificate (effective immediately) for 24 months. If Mr Wheetman was to return to practise, he would need to attend a BSB approved EDI course.
Costs - £3,000 to the BSB - Status
- Open to appeal
- Dates
- Monday 20 - Friday 24 January 2025
-
Tue 21 Jan
- Defendant
-
Alan Wheetman
(Middle Temple)
- Type of hearing
- 5 Person Disciplinary Tribunal
- Panel members
-
- His Honour James Meston KC (Chair)
- Ms Monica Stevenson
- Mr Alexander Horne
- Mr Ian Arundale
- Mr Vince Cullen
- Finding and sentence
-
On 10 February 2025 the Tribunal requested the BSB not to issue Mr Wheetman with a practising certificate (effective immediately) for 24 months. If Mr Wheetman was to return to practise, he would need to attend a BSB approved EDI course.
Costs - £3,000 to the BSB - Status
- Open to appeal
- Dates
- Monday 20 - Friday 24 January 2025
-
Wed 22 Jan
- Defendant
-
Alan Wheetman
(Middle Temple)
- Type of hearing
- 5 Person Disciplinary Tribunal
- Panel members
-
- His Honour James Meston KC (Chair)
- Ms Monica Stevenson
- Mr Alexander Horne
- Mr Ian Arundale
- Mr Vince Cullen
- Finding and sentence
-
On 10 February 2025 the Tribunal requested the BSB not to issue Mr Wheetman with a practising certificate (effective immediately) for 24 months. If Mr Wheetman was to return to practise, he would need to attend a BSB approved EDI course.
Costs - £3,000 to the BSB - Status
- Open to appeal
- Dates
- Monday 20 - Friday 24 January 2025
-
Thu 23 Jan
- Defendant
-
Alan Wheetman
(Middle Temple)
- Type of hearing
- 5 Person Disciplinary Tribunal
- Panel members
-
- His Honour James Meston KC (Chair)
- Ms Monica Stevenson
- Mr Alexander Horne
- Mr Ian Arundale
- Mr Vince Cullen
- Finding and sentence
-
On 10 February 2025 the Tribunal requested the BSB not to issue Mr Wheetman with a practising certificate (effective immediately) for 24 months. If Mr Wheetman was to return to practise, he would need to attend a BSB approved EDI course.
Costs - £3,000 to the BSB - Status
- Open to appeal
- Dates
- Monday 20 - Friday 24 January 2025
-
Fri 24 Jan
- Defendant
-
Alan Wheetman
(Middle Temple)
- Type of hearing
- 5 Person Disciplinary Tribunal
- Panel members
-
- His Honour James Meston KC (Chair)
- Ms Monica Stevenson
- Mr Alexander Horne
- Mr Ian Arundale
- Mr Vince Cullen
- Finding and sentence
-
On 10 February 2025 the Tribunal requested the BSB not to issue Mr Wheetman with a practising certificate (effective immediately) for 24 months. If Mr Wheetman was to return to practise, he would need to attend a BSB approved EDI course.
Costs - £3,000 to the BSB - Status
- Open to appeal
- Dates
- Monday 20 - Friday 24 January 2025
-
Sat 25 Jan
-
Sun 26 Jan
-
Mon 27 Jan
-
Tue 28 Jan
-
Wed 29 Jan
-
Thu 30 Jan
-
Fri 31 Jan
-
Sat 01 Feb
-
Sun 02 Feb