Findings and sanctions of past hearings
Details of published findings and sanctions imposed by Disciplinary Tribunals since BTAS started operations on 1 February 2013 are provided here. Please note that, in line with the BTAS Publication Policy, findings will be removed from the website after 2 years, unless the finding of the Disciplinary Tribunal involves a suspension or disbarment. In these cases, the finding will be posted on the BTAS website indefinitely.
Details of findings and sanctions are published in accordance with the BTAS Publication Policy: Disciplinary Tribunals and other adjudication hearings.
In exceptional circumstances, a tribunal can require the Bar Standards Board to suspend the defendant’s practising certificate from a date determined by the tribunal and which can take immediate effect (rE227 and rE228 of the Bar Standards Board Handbook). In all other instances, the sanction described in the finding sheets attached will only come into effect after the time for appeal has expired. The date is further determined either by a decision of the Treasurer of the defendant’s Inn or the disposal of the appeal should one be made. For specific detail, please refer to the Enforcement Regulations at rE239 and rE241.
Appeals against relevant decisions of Bar Disciplinary Tribunals made before 7 January 2014 were heard by the Visitors to the Inns of Court. Since that date appeals fall under the jurisdiction of the High Court (rE236). The outcome of Visitors’ Hearings (appeals) and appeals to the High Court are also listed on this section of the website.
Using the facility below you may search by: name of barrister; date; type of hearing; sentence and section of the code.
Each set of findings is accorded a status on the following basis:
Open to Appeal: The case is within the period that a barrister can appeal the finding but no appeal has been submitted.
Appeal Pending – Sanction Stayed / Appeal Pending: The barrister has submitted an appeal, which is yet to be heard and the sanction will not be implemented until after the outcome of the appeal is known. This will be the case unless the Disciplinary Tribunal has ordered that the sanction should take effect immediately.
Final – The finding has been pronounced either after the appeal period has expired or following the result of an appeal.
New findings are posted within seven days of a decision, although it can take up to 24 hours for the finding to appear on the website following its posting (or for a finding to not show on the website following its removal).
Details of all publishable findings and sanctionss imposed by Disciplinary Tribunals from 2002 to the present date can also be found on the Bar Standards Board website by clicking here.
An alternative means of dealing with professional misconduct complaints is provided by the Determination by Consent (‘DBC’) procedure. This process is where the Professional Conduct Committee exercises its power to determine the outcome of a disciplinary case with the barrister’s consent. It is designed to provide a more speedy resolution of straightforward cases without the need for a formal Disciplinary Tribunal hearing. Further information on the procedure can be accessed here.
Details of the practising status of any barrister can be found on the Bar Standards Board website, click here for further information.
-
Mon 29 Apr
- Defendant
-
Barry Harwood
(Lincoln's Inn)
- Type of hearing
- 5 Person Disciplinary Tribunal
- Panel members
-
- Mr Yusuf Solley
- Mr Geoffrey Brighton
- Ms Helen Norris
- Ms Sirah Abraham
- His Honour James Meston KC (Chair)
- Finding and sentence
-
On 1 May 2024 the Tribunal disbarred Mr Harwood and ordered the BSB not to issue a practicing certificate pending appeal. Costs of £5,544 awarded to the BSB
- Status
- Final
- Dates
- Monday 29 April - Wednesday 1 May 2024
-
Tue 30 Apr
- Defendant
-
Barry Harwood
(Lincoln's Inn)
- Type of hearing
- 5 Person Disciplinary Tribunal
- Panel members
-
- Mr Yusuf Solley
- Mr Geoffrey Brighton
- Ms Helen Norris
- Ms Sirah Abraham
- His Honour James Meston KC (Chair)
- Finding and sentence
-
On 1 May 2024 the Tribunal disbarred Mr Harwood and ordered the BSB not to issue a practicing certificate pending appeal. Costs of £5,544 awarded to the BSB
- Status
- Final
- Dates
- Monday 29 April - Wednesday 1 May 2024
-
Wed 01 May
- Defendant
-
Barry Harwood
(Lincoln's Inn)
- Type of hearing
- 5 Person Disciplinary Tribunal
- Panel members
-
- Mr Yusuf Solley
- Mr Geoffrey Brighton
- Ms Helen Norris
- Ms Sirah Abraham
- His Honour James Meston KC (Chair)
- Finding and sentence
-
On 1 May 2024 the Tribunal disbarred Mr Harwood and ordered the BSB not to issue a practicing certificate pending appeal. Costs of £5,544 awarded to the BSB
- Status
- Final
- Dates
- Monday 29 April - Wednesday 1 May 2024
-
Thu 02 May
-
Fri 03 May
-
Sat 04 May
-
Sun 05 May
-
Mon 06 May
-
Tue 07 May
-
Wed 08 May
- Defendant
-
Mary Poku
(Lincoln's Inn)
- Type of hearing
- 5 Person Tribunal
- Panel members
-
- Her Honour Judith Hughes KC (Chair)
- Mr Alexander Horne
- Mr Matthew McGhee
- Mr John Vaughan
- Ms Rhona Stevens
- Finding and sentence
-
On 9 May 2024 the Tribunal ordered the BSB not to issue Ms Poku a practising certificate for 24 months and also imposed an immediate order not to issue a practising certificate pending any appeal.
Costs of £3251.35 awarded to the BSB. - Status
- Open to appeal
- Dates
- Wednesday 8 - Thursday 9 May 2024
-
Thu 09 May
- Defendant
-
Mary Poku
(Lincoln's Inn)
- Type of hearing
- 5 Person Tribunal
- Panel members
-
- Her Honour Judith Hughes KC (Chair)
- Mr Alexander Horne
- Mr Matthew McGhee
- Mr John Vaughan
- Ms Rhona Stevens
- Finding and sentence
-
On 9 May 2024 the Tribunal ordered the BSB not to issue Ms Poku a practising certificate for 24 months and also imposed an immediate order not to issue a practising certificate pending any appeal.
Costs of £3251.35 awarded to the BSB. - Status
- Open to appeal
- Dates
- Wednesday 8 - Thursday 9 May 2024
-
Fri 10 May
-
Sat 11 May
-
Sun 12 May
-
Mon 13 May
- Defendant
-
Ramya Nagesh
(Lincoln's Inn)
- Type of hearing
- 5 Person Disciplinary Tribunal
- Panel members
-
- Her Honour Janet Waddicor (Chair)
- Mr Scott McDonnell
- Mrs Aaminah Khan
- Ms Helen Norris
- Ms Stephanie McIntosh
- Finding and sentence
- On 14 May 2024 the Tribunal dismissed all charges against Ms Nagesh and concluded the case with no further action. Full reasons to follow.
- Status
- Final
- Dates
- Monday 13 - Tuesday 14 May 2024
-
Tue 14 May
- Defendant
-
Ramya Nagesh
(Lincoln's Inn)
- Type of hearing
- 5 Person Disciplinary Tribunal
- Panel members
-
- Her Honour Janet Waddicor (Chair)
- Mr Scott McDonnell
- Mrs Aaminah Khan
- Ms Helen Norris
- Ms Stephanie McIntosh
- Finding and sentence
- On 14 May 2024 the Tribunal dismissed all charges against Ms Nagesh and concluded the case with no further action. Full reasons to follow.
- Status
- Final
- Dates
- Monday 13 - Tuesday 14 May 2024
-
Wed 15 May
-
Thu 16 May
-
Fri 17 May
-
Sat 18 May
-
Sun 19 May
-
Mon 20 May
-
Tue 21 May
-
Wed 22 May
-
Thu 23 May
-
Fri 24 May
-
Sat 25 May
-
Sun 26 May
-
Mon 27 May
-
Tue 28 May
-
Wed 29 May
- Defendant
-
Amjad Hussain
(Lincoln's Inn)
- Type of hearing
- 3 Person Disciplinary Tribunal
- Panel members
- Finding and sentence
-
On 29 May 2024 the Tribunal issued Mr Hussain with a £5,000 fine and a Reprimand.
Costs - £2,670 awarded to the BSB. - Status
- Final
- Date
- Wednesday 29 May 2024
-
Thu 30 May
-
Fri 31 May
-
Sat 01 Jun
-
Sun 02 Jun